I’ll keep it short.

The idea is good, improvements do need to be made. Here are some ideas

• Add a smaller creator to the board, who can give input from other small creators

• Off of Shlenksytems idea, have the name of the mock, and not the name of the creator, to further help the small creators

I do also think that this decision was very rushed and not needed at this point in time. I was on fanspo during 23 and there were at times 8 mocks going on at the same time. Just a week before all of this was implemented, I along with other people were asking if there was any mocks planned, bricksngamesfun and onfire were the only ones to plan one. I kinda brought attention to mocks and made a lot of people want to make them. This would be amazing to put in if we had an abundance of mocks.

I also don’t want the mock board to get defensive, snappy or go on power trips. I have seen some people get defensive once or twice when it was first implemented, which makes sense. If a person goes on a power trip and riggs the voting, or not putting on a mock on purpose to the ballot, than the system is failing and the person shouldn’t be on the board

I like the system, it probably wasn’t the right time to implement rules, but I do think it will turn out fine if people don’t abuse the rules.

I hope I don’t get too much backlash for this, I’m just trying to keep things as fair as possible for everyone. Also please try to keep fanspo civil, we have enough stuff going on across the world, it would be amazing if he can at least have some peace on this site

Like and flame to try to get as many people to see this and spread the word of keeping peace on fanspo and making the committee more fair for everyone