Warriors, PaoloOwnsYou: A

If the Warriors want to go for a final finals run, this seems like a reasonable trade. It's also good from the Pelicans' perspective since they get a temporary PG until they find a permanent solution. The only thing is that I feel like it might be one pick too much, and unless the Warriors get rid of Wiggins, they can't really afford Ingram.

Clippers, DeadPoole: C

I just think that this is way too much for Jones. And they don't have enough cap space to sign Harden and George, so this whole thing doesn't really make sense for the Clippers. It would make them more competative so thats why it's still a C

Lakers, SeattleThunder: C-

This is a textbook Blow-up trade. To start with the positives this would def make the Lakers more competetive. Negatives: To many to count

Heat, MeWasntHere: B+

This is an interesting take on the Donavan Mitchell situation, if they would do this this would be a sort of last shot at the champoinship. The only problem is that you might lose a lot of depth because of this trade (kind of what happend to the suns this year)

Bucks, KobeBufkin4ROTY: F The hole point of this challenge is to try and make the team more competative and trading Damian lillard for herro and isaac is definitly not an upgrade. This is strait ass