When I look at the era Wilt played in, there wasn't enough talent to even be considered for a player to rightfully say they dominated. One of the main reasons why Bill isn't in my top 10.

Wilt wouldn't be the same in today's NBA as well. You telling me that a lanky 7-foot is getting a layup or dunk on WEMBY?!?! Getting past Kawhi on the perimeter.

His game is VERY one-dimensional. You can argue all you want about how Wilt could develop other skills and I think he could as well. But he didn't. Plain and simple.

The argument that his team needed him is based on two factors. One, weak era, two I'm pretty sure they had a better offensive rating when he left the floor. Is it wilt's fault? No. The offense became too much about Wilt and barely got the ball to anyone, and only one guy (Billy) was truly able to thrive under those circumstances.

Any other points you want to add on, I'll counter them as well. I know you're still a bit upset about me leaving Laker Nation, and I apologize. Just because we have our differences doesn't mean we have to be enemies.

Sorry, this one's not as long as wilts (Dont even...) I'm not as passionate on the topic. ALSO HES NOT AT 51 FOR ME. Hes 30