Key Thoughts: Community Engagement: It shows a high level of investment from the users. They are not just using the site for its tools (like the trade machine); they are deeply invested in its social dynamics and history. The investigation itself acts as an engagement driver.

The Recurring Cycle: The core issue—a user trying to "save" or "govern" the site and the subsequent backlash/skepticism—highlights a recurring power struggle within the Fanspo community (referencing the previous "Olseneli" and "mock committee" issues).

The "Sherlock Holmes" Framing: The author, u/Onfire, smartly frames the speculation as a fun, investigative game, which makes the drama entertaining rather than just negative.

Controversial Tactics: The new user, FanspoNews67, is employing controversial tactics (like listing users like Lukaglazer as "recruits" without permission), which is clearly generating attention but also anger, confirming the author's initial skepticism about their strategy.

Overall, it's a fascinating look at how a niche online community handles leadership changes and internal controversy, turning it into a topic of discussion itself.