the MVP Award is odd because In its name its Most valuable Player it should BPOTY best player of the year. Basically Instead of it being the most Valuable player its the best players. Why not Make it two awards? IT could be just a different name Right...? Idea 1:MVP will be every year like always. you should have a lot of trade value while being young. Luka will most likely to be MVP (with these standers) his value will be: 5-7 frp, 2-3 young, players and salary. BPOTY will just be the best player of the year a little different though. The different will be you have to make the conference finals make a all-star and make all Defense or have at least 28 and 7apg and 5 rpg maybe even have 33 ppg. Last year that includes Jokic LeBron Tatum but Jokic would still win. Idea 2: Just rename simple right (Yeah lol no). MVP is in the MLB NFL ect everybody will knows MVP but BPOTY 10% of the NBA will know BPOTY . What if some just comes up to you and says: JoEL EmBiIEd iS tHis YeArS BPOTY its odd. NOWON WILL LIKE IT, Just change the name all of the sudden. You can just keep the name right. Wrong MVP makes no sense because because every year its the best player not the most valuable. You can just change history. WRONG you cant change history (i wish you could). To conclude the MVP award is vary odd. for ins tens Kobe Bryant has 0 or 1 MVP witch is dumb. I think we should have idea 1.It is way better then idea 2.Please tell me your thoughts.