Really good shooter at the collegiate level, 44% from three! Personally, I didn't like Dillingham's shot purely from the film I watched on him (I still thought it was ok), but his splits are too good to brush aside, and they do make me believe in his shooting ability more. I don't think he's going to be anywhere as efficient from deep at the next level, mostly due to his FT shooting not being the most ideal, but his shot should still translate fine.
I don't mind his finishing, but I don't think it's that great. It's just kind of alright. Wish he drove a little bit more (maybe he does, but on the film I watched, he didn't).
Solid ball handler. Has some nice moves in his bag, there's a reason he has a mixtape on YouTube called "10 Minutes of Rob Dillingham EMBARASSING Defenders!". I don't think his ball handling is as great as people make it to be, but I still like it.
Has a good FG percentage of 47% alongside a good shooting efficiency.
Also has a good assist/turnover ratio, 1.9.
Young, turned 19 this year.
High motor player. Really quick offensively... not so much defensively, but at times he can showcase his speed.
+
Worries:
Briefly mentioned his FT percentage above, so I'll quickly expand on it. It's far from bad really, he's 79% from the line. It's a little below the average for a PG and a SG (a position I think he can play as well). Like I said, his FT percentage is the main reason I don't think he's going to be 44% from three in the NBA, but his shot should still translate decently.
A little undersized for a PG being 6'3. Not awful, but with taller points becoming the new meta for teams now, it becomes more of a flaw. His height brings up even more issues if he does play SG minutes, since he's even more undersized for a SG than a PG.
His high motor has its problems. Sometimes he would end up trying to do too much offensively with his ball handling or finishes around the rim which would lead to turnovers or bad misses. I feel like he's slightly more in control than he's not, but I don't think it should be a debate in the first place.
This entire section might just be me, so read it and decide what you think. There was a number of games where Dillingham was clutch. He brought Kentucky into fighting distance nearing the finale of the match, or he even helped them take the lead after being down (great example would be him at the end of the LSU game). He'd heat up and start hitting shots from everywhere, especially from three though. My issue is, why can't he play like this consistently? All the games where he clutched up for his team were games where he was cold before that. If he played at that same level and with that same importance, his team wouldn't even need for him to heat up at the end of matches to get close to winning. I personally find more validity in my point when looking at Dillingham's scoring efficiency, which isn't that great and a little below mediocre. Some people might appreciate him hitting shots at the right time, which is understandable, but I want him to be hitting those shots throughout the entire game, not only when his team really needs it.
I don't dislike his off-ball movement, but I don't really like it either. While he does move around off the ball, he only moves around the perimeter. If he cut to the basket more often, he'd be scoring more often. He does get some good looks from three because of his movement, but in most of the games I watched, I don't remember him converting from those openings. I also wished he was more active off the ball in general, there was a number of games where he didn't do much when the ball wasn't in his hands.
I think Dillingham's passing ability is fairly mediocre. His passes are pretty basic and not anything crazy, I'd say they're like barely above the bare minimum or the average that I'd hope for. He makes his passes look a little better than they are by adding some flashy elements to them, but they're really not that great. Averaged 3.9 assists per game this season.
Nearing the threshold of too many turnovers, finished the season averaging 2 per game.
+
Dislikes:
Dillingham is not good defensively. Shows potential of being a pesk on the perimeter and utilizing his motor to apply pressure well (best example of this would be the Florida game where he was visibly bothering Pullin and preventing him from doing much), but they're just flashes which get overshadowed by other looming issues of his. He gets blown by a lot, he's not going to make an additional effort to catch up to his opponent if he does get blown by, he has poor hand placement which leads to a lot of fouls (averaged 2.6 fouls per game), almost every attempted steal of his is a reach-in foul, and he's a little too out of control at times. I guess some potential is there, but considering he's also undersized, how much potential does he really have? Averaged 1 steal and 0.1 blocks per game.
Too skinny. Really needs to put on some weight or he might get big bodied by point guards.
Not a good rebounder. Rarely saw him get a board, and if he did, it fell right to his lap. The one time I saw him fight for rebounds was the one game where he could not get a board to save his life. Too small and too scrawny to end up getting the ball from someone else. Averaged 2.9 rebounds per game this season, which even that feels a little generous.
+
I think my expectations for Dillingham were a little high when coming into this, which is why I left a little disappointed. His film didn't make me like him, but his stats made me grow on him a little. I still don't think he's that great, but I don't think he's that bad either. Summarizes his game well, just kind of alright.
Player comp: the first two people which come to mind are Bones Hyland and Darius Garland, but I think he's more Darius Garland than Bones Hyland.