Fanspo logoFanspo logo
Ron Holland II

G League Ignite

HT/WT/WS6' 6", 197lbs

Big Board Rankings


Community Scouting Reports (101)


TheRaptor
u/TheRaptor

#9

RANK


Ron Holland is both one of the most fun and one of the most frustrating prospects I have ever scouted. He is very talented in a lot of areas, most notably on the defensive end. I wouldn’t call him a lockdown defender, but he is a really good event creator on that end. He gets a lot of steals with his quick hands and ability to get into passing lanes. He also gets a lot of Anthony Edwards type of blocks where he’ll come flying out of nowhere to send a shot into the stands. On the other side of the ball, he is a good scorer in transition and finisher around the rim. He is good at getting to the rim off the ball by making quick cuts and/or using his strength to push through bodies. The questions start to arise when you look at his ball handling ability and scoring outside of the paint. He is not a good shooter, has a loose handle that he doesn’t control well, and is an inaccurate passer who makes more bad passes than good ones. There are a lot of different potential outcomes for Ron Holland, and the team drafting him will need to be prepared for that. However, it would be hard to look past a guy with Ron’s level of athleticism and defensive prowess in a draft like this. He is pretty safely a top ten prospect on my board at this point.

Shades of — Jaylen Brown, Andrew Wiggins, Tari Eason, college Josh Jackson

Best team fits — Portland, Memphis



Analysis done by @TheRaptor. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
jbb
u/jbb

#15

RANK


Holland has a lot to like about his game. He’s an elite athlete, he accelerates really quickly and he’s strong, he’s a great driver and transition ball handler, and as a big forward, that’s a great skill set. Holland also has incredible hands and he’s a very good defensive player. But his shooting stats are terrible and his passing isn’t good. There’s two scenarios I see with ron. The first one is he’s exactly what we want him to be, a primary or secondary option who’s an elite slasher and creator and defender. If this happens, I’ll regret where I’m ranking him now. The other scenario is where he really struggles in the nba, his lack of shooting is exploited and it makes him not a very effective offensive player. In this scenario he’s too high, and neither scenario is more likely than the other. He has a lot to like about him but we’ve seen guys like him struggle in the nba before.



Analysis done by @jbb. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
u/esteven

#14

RANK


Pros:

  • Great finisher at the rim! Can play through contact, gets tough takes, and is comfortable driving to the paint.

  • Decent ball handler... not flashy or excessive but can get to his spots to either 1. score or 2. create for his teammates.

  • Also a decent rebounder, at least defensively. Averaging 6.6 rebounds per game (5.1 being defensive). He passes the eye test as well, showing in a sizable number of clips that when he wants to, he can rebound the ball well and come up with it over someone else.

  • Good height for a Small Forward; 6'8.

  • Very young, will only be 18 on draft night. I feel like this is one of the more appealing parts of Holland's draft report, because it gives a franchise plenty of time to mold him as they want and develop him to his full potential. Which transitions me well to the Cons section...

+

Cons:

  • To buy into Holland is to buy into what he could potentially be. Holland shows flashes of being great at a lot of things! He could be a great passer, he could be a decent shooter, a decent defender, he could be a really good overall player if he reaches his potential. Holland has good court vision and can create for his teammates; he's averaging 3.2 assists per game! But, he's also averaging 3 turnovers per game. For every dime he throws, he throws an awful pass right after. He can hit every three, whether it's wide or contested one game, then go ice cold and miss every shot the next game. He could give a lot of effort on the defensive end, poking the ball and getting deflections, then the next game, he could just stop trying and give up on possessions defensively because he got blown by, or he fell for a cross-over, or hezi or... whatever. You might be saying, "why is this a con lil bro if he could develop into all of this why is this a bad thing". To that I say, you have a point. IF he develops into all of that, he's going to be successful in the league. But, what if he doesn't? It's important to keep in mind that there's a chance he doesn't become any of the good things I listed. It's up for you to decide whether you like Holland or not purely from potential... if you do that's fine! If you don't, that's also fine! I think people should also take into account what Holland could be by also acknowledging how successful the G League Ignite has been. It's being shut down soon, so that kind of puts things into more perspective on how Ignite prospects are shining out to be. tl;dr: A lot of Holland's appealingness is glimpses of potential he shows in multiple aspects, but it's important to keep in mind that he has the chance of never developing into the player he could be.

  • Ok no more long rants. The next few bullet points will be on issues I mentioned shortly in the paragraph above. --[]--

  • I'm not sold on Holland's defensive ability. On film, he never really stood out, and at times he would just not try. There are so many moments where he just sees his opponent set up for a shot, not close out or defend, and just watch the ball go into the hoop. He wouldn't apply pressure, he would be slow to react, etc. Although he's averaging 2.5 steals per game, it's hard to see that on film. And also, you should keep in mind that's he's averaging 3.3 fouls per game, wayyy too much. That's more fouls than steals...

  • Holland is averaging 3.2 assists per game! Looks great on paper, but when you realize he's also averaging 3 turnovers per game and has a 1.07 assist/turnover ratio (bad if you didn't know), you kind of get put off from his passing ability (at least I do). Like I mentioned before, he could be a great playmaker, but he's not that now.

  • This is one of the more intriguing parts of Holland's game, his shooting. He's really streaky, he's either hitting every three or bricking every three, doesn't seem to be an in-between. Currently he's an abysmal 24% from three, but, he's 75% from the line! Although I don't like Holland's three-point, I do like his mid-range. He has a really nice pull-up middy which always seemed to go in. Holland could develop into a decent shooter, but again, just potential. --[]--

  • Don't like that he doesn't do much when the ball isn't in his hands. Doesn't cut very often, doesn't really find better looks for himself, just kind of sits there and waits to see what his teammates do.

  • Mediocre FG percentage; 44%.

  • Would like if he put on some more weight, only 206 lbs.

+

I yapped enough about Holland; I don't have much else to say. I see the hype around him, but I also see more bad in him than I think others do. If Holland doesn't get drafted by the right team, I think he could be a bust honestly. That's just me though, you decide for yourself.

ALSO, the film on Holland I watched seems a little suspicious to be honest, so I could be way off on how he plays... blame that on who I'm watching film from, not me!



Analysis done by @esteven. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
LeakyBlack
u/LeakyBlack

#16

RANK


Scouting Report: Ron holland is an elite on ball defender. He has the best hands of anyone I’ve ever scouted. He moves his hips well and is quick laterally. He could bulk up a bit but is pretty versatile. Off the ball on defense he could improve but nothing to worry about. On offense he is elite in transition as he is very strong finish through contacts and drawing fouls. He’s very athletic strong leaper and he’s fast and quick. He is for sure a reactive passer but he usually finds the right man. He’s a good finisher but could work on using his left and his touch is solid but nothing that would set him apart. His 3pt shooting is not great, very low percentages, the mechanics aren’t terrible but I wouldn’t project him to be a good shooter. He has a tight handle and is good at using hesitations.



Analysis done by @LeakyBlack. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
Jack Anderson
u/jda7749

#2

RANK


  1. Ron Holland - Ignite (SG/SF - HT: 6’8” - WING: 6’11” - WT: 200 - A: 18y)

    • Athletic wing who doesn’t quite have the strength to play the 4 but has great wing size and strength at the 2 and 3. If he puts on weight he could easily be a great power wing.

    • GREAT force driving to the rim but doesn’t have much shake or creativity

    • Great perimeter defense, can guard 1-4

    • Developing outside shot, not a good 3pt shooter yet

    • Turnover prone, bad AST:TO ratio

    • Shades of Ausar Thomson, Peyton Watson, RJ Barrett, Jae’Sean Tate

    • Best fit: Portland, Memphis, Utah

    • Worst fit: Detroit, Toronto, Washington, Brooklyn Range: 1 - 5



Analysis done by @jda7749. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
Slam Dunk
u/slamdunk2607199

#7

RANK


Poste(s) : SF

Âge : 18 ans

Taille : 2m03

Stats : 20.6pts, 6.6reb, 3.0ast, 2.5stl, 0.6blk

Adresse : 44%fg, 24%3pt, 76%tf

Très maladroit comparé aux autres SF de sa cuvée, Holland est de loin le plus athlétique et "agressif" offensivement. Ces deux traits sont innés contrairement à l’adresse qu’il peut évidemment améliorer, surtout que sa mécanique est plutôt propre. Finisseur explosif à l'approche du panier, Holland peut marquer malgré le contact avec le potentiel d'attirer de nombreuses fautes, notamment en transition où il est hyper dynamique. Malgré son jeune âge, il possède déjà l'expérience des matchs de haut niveau en G-League (comparé à la NCAA). Peu de joueurs ont le potentiel all-star dans cette Draft 2024, mais Ron Holland fait sûrement partie de ceux-là grâce à ses qualités physiques et son ardeur en attaque.



Analysis done by @slamdunk2607199. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
Brett Bischel
u/brettbischel

#12

RANK


....................
Pts36:22.0 ↑
Reb36:7.5
Ast362.9
Stl362.6
FG%:46.0
3p%:24.0 ↓
PER:15.8
Orat:95.8 ↓
Drat:114.8
.......
18.9 y/o
Height: 6'6.25" (w/o shoes)
Max Vertical Jump: 38.0" (17th best 2024 Combine)
3/4 Court Sprint: 3.10 sec
.......
G League Ignite
G League #20 Point Per Game Leader (not on leader board due to only playing 14 games due to injury.)
#2 Ranked ESPN High-School Player (2023)
Injuries
Highlights


Analysis done by @brettbischel. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
PHILLY IN CHARGE 🟦
u/SixersinCharge

#25

RANK


Overview: Ron Holland is a 6'6", 204-pound wing/forward from the G League Ignite who's currently the projected no. 5 pick in the 2024 NBA Draft. He's a versatile and high-energy player known for his elite defensive prowess, improving offensive game, and leadership skills. Strengths:

  • Defensive lockdown: Holland projects as an immediate defensive impact player. His long wingspan, quick feet, and high basketball IQ enable him to guard all five positions on the court. He can switch onto guards on the perimeter, contest shots effectively, and disrupt passing lanes. His defensive instincts and tenacity make him a nightmare for opposing offenses.

  • Emerging offensive versatility: While defense is his calling card, Holland's offensive game is steadily evolving. He shows a well-rounded skillset, attacking the rim with athleticism, finishing through contact, and knocking down mid-range jumpers consistently. He's also developing a three-point shot, which could make him a true two-way threat.

  • High motor and leadership: Holland plays with relentless energy and brings a competitive spirit to the court. He's always hustling, diving for loose balls, and motivating his teammates. His leadership qualities shine through, making him a vocal presence on the floor and a potential locker room leader.

  • Athleticism and size: Holland has the frame and physical tools to succeed in the NBA. He's quick and explosive, able to elevate for rebounds and dunks. His size and strength allow him to hold his own in the post and create mismatches against smaller defenders. Weaknesses:

  • Consistency on offense: While his offensive repertoire is expanding, Holland's shot selection can be inconsistent at times. He can force tough shots or rely on his athleticism instead of utilizing his full skillset. He needs to continue refining his decision-making and offensive polish.

  • Three-point shot: As mentioned, Holland's three-pointer is still a work in progress. He can hit open shots, but his range and overall consistency need improvement. Developing a reliable three-point threat would open up even more scoring opportunities and make him a more dangerous offensive weapon.

  • Limited experience: Although he's playing in the G League, Holland still lacks experience against established NBA talent. The jump in competition and physicality could pose a challenge initially. He'll need time to adjust and adapt to the demands of the league. Overall: Ron Holland is a unique talent with the potential to be a defensive cornerstone and impactful offensive contributor in the NBA. His defensive versatility, athleticism, and leadership qualities are highly coveted, making him a prime candidate for the top pick in the 2024 Draft. While his offensive game needs continued refinement, his drive and work ethic suggest he'll work hard to become a well-rounded two-way player. The team that drafts him will be acquiring a high-character player with the potential to become a franchise cornerstone. Additional Notes:

  • Holland is known for his strong work ethic and dedication to improvement. He's constantly working on his weaknesses and adding new skills to his game.

  • Some scouts compare Holland's defensive versatility and leadership to Kawhi Leonard, while others see him as a more aggressive offensive player in the mold of Scottie Pippen.

  • He's a popular choice for the no. 1 pick, but some mock drafts project him going slightly lower depending on team needs and preferences. Overall, Ron Holland is a player to watch closely in the lead-up to the 2024 NBA Draft. He has the talent and potential to make a significant impact on the league for years to come.



Analysis done by @SixersinCharge. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
Alison Ricardo Becker
u/alison_timy

#4

RANK


Joabe select

Outro time que necessita de um C urgentemente, mas não tem nenhum na classe pelo qual vale queimar uma Pick 4. Holland talvez não seja a opção mais indicada aqui, ao mesmo tempo seria desperdício deixar passar.

Comparação: Mathurin, RJ Barrett, Jaylen Brown



Analysis done by @alison_timy. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.
Dave Tippit
u/davetippit

#19

RANK


Vecenie Holland possesses prototypical size and athleticism for an NBA wing. He’s 6-6 1/2 with a 6-10 3/4 wingspan, but more than that, his athleticism is fasttwitch and he reacts rapidly on the court. He has a lightning-quick first step, is very fast and covers ground quickly in the open floor. His movements are coordinated and fluid. He’s a good leaper who can get up in space and dunk with authority. Holland’s motor might be his best singular trait.

Given his motor, Holland also projects as a good defender, even if he needs to clean up his fundamentals. He is a good transition shot blocker and regularly jumps passing lanes to create action plays with deflections and steals. He gambles too often, but those moments can turn defense into offense and fuel the best parts of his offensive game right now. His defensive playmaking should translate to the NBA. Holland’s athleticism and size should allow him to switch onto the one through four positions if he can improve his technique. When locked in, Holland could stay in front of everyone, using his chest to cut off drives and his hands to disrupt ballhandlers at the point of attack

The big questions for Holland involve his feel for the game. His decision-making on both ends of the floor was messy throughout the season. On offense, he took a ton of bad, contested shots and turned the ball over too much. In fairness, Holland was overextended as the primary creator for a G League team that lacked anyone else resembling one, and the rest of the team-building strategy was a mess. However, Holland’s handle is loose at this point, and he’s not always capable of controlling the ball when he must self-create. His body control on drives isn’t great, especially when he must be the one to create the initial separation. He doesn’t play with varied pace when coming off screens. Everything looks like it’s moving 1,000 miles per hour for him....Holland has never been much of a playmaker for others and did not do a great job finding open teammates after drives.

Shooting is the swing skill that will determine if Holland can at least turn into a high-floor rotation player. If he can knock down 3s, he’ll play in the NBA for a long time. If he can’t, his role becomes more precarious. Holland hit 24 percent from distance this season — not a great sign — and his track record as a 3-point shooter before that isn't strong, either...While Holland was a creative finisher this year, his conversion rate around the rim was not great because the degree of difficulty on his attempts was so high. He made just 55.1 percent at the rim in half-court settings — a low number for the G League — despite the tools referenced in the strengths section...He scored just 28 points off cuts this year, a low number for someone with his motor and skill set. He should be a great scramble defender — and I think he will be one in the future — but just wasn’t this season. He often came out too high to contest good offensive players who could attack his front foot and get by him. He fell for a lot of pump fakes, and opponents began using his aggressive tendencies against him. Holland also got held up on too many screens. He didn’t take great routes to get around them and was a step slow recognizing where they came from

SUMMARY: I’ve changed my evaluation of Holland more than any other player in this class. I often struggle to project players like Holland who haven’t demonstrated consistent feel for the game. His shooting is an issue; he’s willing to take them, but he made just 24 percent and must clean up his mechanics.



Analysis done by @davetippit. View their full  draft big board and scouting reports here.