Vecenie
Holland possesses prototypical size and athleticism for an NBA wing. He’s 6-6 1/2 with a 6-10 3/4 wingspan, but more than that, his athleticism is fasttwitch and he reacts rapidly on the court. He has a lightning-quick first step, is very fast and covers ground quickly in the open floor. His movements are coordinated
and fluid. He’s a good leaper who can get up in space and dunk with authority. Holland’s motor might be his best singular trait.
Given his motor, Holland also projects as a good defender, even if he needs to clean up his fundamentals. He is a good transition shot blocker and regularly jumps
passing lanes to create action plays with deflections and steals. He gambles too often, but those moments can turn defense into offense and fuel the best parts of his
offensive game right now. His defensive playmaking should translate to the NBA.
Holland’s athleticism and size should allow him to switch onto the one through four positions if he can improve his technique. When locked in, Holland could stay in
front of everyone, using his chest to cut off drives and his hands to disrupt ballhandlers at the point of attack
The big questions for Holland involve his feel for the game. His decision-making on both ends of the floor was messy throughout the season. On
offense, he took a ton of bad, contested shots and turned the ball over too much. In fairness, Holland was overextended as the primary creator for a G League team
that lacked anyone else resembling one, and the rest of the team-building strategy was a mess. However, Holland’s handle is loose at this point, and he’s not always
capable of controlling the ball when he must self-create. His body control on drives isn’t great, especially when he must be the one to create the initial separation. He
doesn’t play with varied pace when coming off screens. Everything looks like it’s moving 1,000 miles per hour for him....Holland has never been much of a playmaker for others and did not do a great job finding open teammates after drives.
Shooting is the swing skill that will determine if Holland can at least turn into a high-floor rotation player. If he can knock down 3s, he’ll play in the NBA for a long
time. If he can’t, his role becomes more precarious. Holland hit 24 percent from distance this season — not a great sign — and his track record as a 3-point shooter
before that isn't strong, either...While Holland was a creative finisher this year, his conversion rate around the rim was not great because the degree of difficulty on his attempts was so high. He
made just 55.1 percent at the rim in half-court settings — a low number for the G League — despite the tools referenced in the strengths section...He scored just 28 points off cuts this year, a low number for someone with
his motor and skill set. He should be a great scramble defender — and I think he will be one in the future — but just wasn’t this season. He often came out too high to contest
good offensive players who could attack his front foot and get by him. He fell for a lot of pump fakes, and opponents began using his aggressive tendencies against
him.
Holland also got held up on too many screens. He didn’t take great routes to get around them and was a step slow recognizing where they came from
SUMMARY: I’ve changed my evaluation of Holland more than any other player in this class. I often struggle to project players like Holland who haven’t demonstrated
consistent feel for the game. His shooting is an issue; he’s willing to take them, but he made just 24 percent and must clean up his mechanics.